Ben Langhinrichs

Photograph of Ben Langhinrichs

E-mail address - Ben Langhinrichs







Recent posts

Tue 22 Sep 2020

Exciton Boost - Barbarians are at the gate



Thu 17 Sep 2020

Exciton Boost - WYSI(hopefully)WYG



Tue 15 Sep 2020

Exciton Boost - Formula(s) for success


October, 2020
SMTWTFS
    01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Search the weblog





























Genii Weblog

Open XML BRM FAQ posted

Fri 16 Nov 2007, 08:46 AM



by Ben Langhinrichs
FAQ has been released for the Open XML Ballot Resolution Meeting, and it makes for interesting reading.  Three points which seem notable, and about which I have seen contradictory speculation elsewhere recently are:
2.5  Is it possible the meeting will extend beyond the 5 allotted days?
No.
It is reiterated in multiple ways, five days is it, with no recourse.  I don't have any idea how they are supposed to get through all those comments in that big a spec in that time, but that is the task at hand, with no extensions possible.
6.2  In what ways may an NB change its vote?
NBs that voted in the 2 September ballot may change their vote from any of “approve”, “disapprove” or “abstain” to any of “approve”, “disapprove” or “abstain”.
So anybody can change their vote from "Yes" to "No".  Their have been rumors that the only change possible was from "No" to "Yes", but that isn't true.  Anybody can change any direction, including to "Abstain".
4.5  What if there is not time in the meeting to satisfy NBs’ concerns?
If NBs find the outcome of the BRM inadequate then their recourse is to disapprove the DIS.
In some ways, this is the most telling of all.  No matter what anybody says or promises or implies, the appropriate response to not having enough time to address all comments to your satisfaction is to vote "No".  They do emphasize that you can do anything you like and have any justification you want for changing your vote in any way, but the bottom line purpose of the BRM is to either resolve all the issues to your satisfaction, or vote "No".

Copyright 2007 Genii Software Ltd.

What has been said:


638.1. Nathan T. Freeman
(11/16/2007 07:33 AM)

I love that Alex Brown actually cares about protecting the ISO process here.

One thing I think is interesting is that the delegations cannot alter their attendance based on the topic-at-hand in the BRM. Which means that each participant must basically be an expert in ALL ASPECTS of the spec in order to intelligently vote.

I really wonder how many people have a comprehensive knowledge of OOXML and the issues presented in it?